By Rawan AbuShaban.
Accessibility, variety, and high performance – these are the promises of the digital age. Most of our contemporary pleasures have been adapted onto one electronic platform or another for these very alluring prospects, including one of the most primordial of pleasures – reading a book.

Digitized e-books are progressively pushing traditional, hard-copy books out of the market and out of the hands of readers with their promise of a better, more efficient product. However, this switch dilutes the reader’s experience, and empirical evidence points towards the health risks and inefficiencies attributed to reading onscreen.
Are there perks for readers to enjoy in this modern shift to e-books? Yes, there are.
Do these advantages outweigh those of the e-book’s paper predecessor? No, they don’t.
In fact, the slim benefits of reading e-books lie in the colossal shadow of physical books, which promise the reader far more than their virtual contenders.
How do real books surpass the shortcomings of electronic books? Let’s observe how some of the assumptions commonly associated with e-books compete with the facts we already know about their good, old-fashioned paper progenitors – real books.
E-book vendors offer remote access to thousands of downloadable titles; real book vendors offer access to millions.
With most e-books, cheap new purchases to add to the reader’s digital collection are just a few clicks away. While physical books may not always offer the immediate relief of finding the title you want, that is the very purpose of libraries and bookshops.
Not only do these venues offer hosts of books that are certain to include the one your heart desires – likely even for free – they also provide a selection of books that you never knew you wanted. In his book, The Unknown Unknown: Bookshops and the Delight of Not Getting What You Wanted, author Mark Forsyth says, “Lord, deliver us from what we already knew we wanted. Give us some new desires, the weirder the better.”
Books exist in the millions, and are right at our fingertips, for those of us who know how to use basic, common resources.
The existence of e-books makes it easier to get what you think you want; the existence of real books makes it a journey to get what you truly need.
Downloading a text is easy, but whatever happened to the sheer adventure of pursuing literature? In the pursuit of e-books, the reader misses out on navigating libraries and perusing bookshelves for titles old and new, for rare finds or new first editions to add to a home collection, to savor time and again, and to share with family and friends.
E-books strip the reader of the delight of this process, who is then left to sulk onwards in a short-lived journey that ends at a PayPal login screen.
E-books give you information; real books let your brain process information.
E-books may seem practical, insofar as the virtual copy of a text can be stored neatly inside some pocketable device that you already own. However, the pragmatism of reading onscreen pretty much ends there.
On average, it takes a reader 20-30% more time to read onscreen text as opposed to text on paper. Furthermore, readers are less likely to remember information read onscreen rather than information read on paper. Texts read on paper deliver the fullest overall retention of information to the reader.
A recent study in Norway uncovered the same results, attributing the shortcomings of e-books in information retention to the lack of the physical, tactile sense of progress felt by the reader. Head researcher Anne Mangen found that in order to retain information, a reader must read uninterrupted for long durations of time – an activity commonly and successfully entertained by pages of text that are manifested and bound together, e.g. physical books.
With the many irresistible facets of the internet only clicks away, readers who use iPads and computers as their media of choice are actually at risk of losing information with every break they take.
E-books also inhibit the reader’s ability to empathize and immerse themselves in the text. In regard to yet another study in which readers were given an upsetting story to read either on paper or onscreen, researchers stated that “paper readers did report higher on measures having to do with empathy and transportation and immersion, and narrative coherence, than iPad readers.”
E-books and texts read onscreen do little justice to the fertility of the stories that have been crafted specifically for the reader’s pleasure and metaphysical transportation, and result in inauthentic reading experiences.
E-books nourish your mind; real books nourish your mind and body, without consequently damaging both.
While e-books may seem to serve as useful alternatives for readers on the go, the practical disadvantages and health risks of reading books on electronic platforms far outweigh the benefits.
E-books are associated with increased levels of stress and exhaustion on the part of the reader. This detracts from the pleasure of reading, and ultimately affects the reader’s overall experience.
Screen glare and light emitted by most e-readers decrease melatonin, an important sleep hormone. This prolongs the time it takes for a person to fall asleep, and thus decreases the length and quality the reader has to sleep at night. This often results in fatigue and sleep deficiency, which may ultimately lead to metabolic disease such as obesity and diabetes, if aggravated. Conversely, reading physical books doesn’t impede sleep, and helps calm down the brain. Unlike e-books, real books don’t stress the reader; in fact, physical books alleviate stress and help the reader relax, resulting in better, undisturbed sleep.
E-books provide you with texts; real books provide you with escape.
In a modern society where non-electronic devices have become novel items, real books are all the more necessary to the reader who wishes to relax and unwind. The days of students and professionals are spent staring at computer screens, using smartphones to e-mail bosses or share photos of cats, watching television at home, studying from lecture slides that the nicer professors upload to the net, Skyping moms, and taking artfully crafted selfies. At the end of the day, all you want to do is curl up with a nice book and unplug – but how can this unplugging ever be achieved if you’re staring at the same white screen your face has been glued to all day?
Real books not only help us get off the grid, they take us off devices entirely and allow us to escape the digitized lifestyle that seems to confine us from all sides. With a real book in hand, we are able to finally disconnect, strip ourselves of our networks and alter-egos, if only for a brief amount of time, to indulge in a secret pleasure that can only be described as reading and imagining – without the unhealthy side-effects.
The allure of the digital age cannot detract from the numerous studies which unanimously point to the unhealthy side effects of reading onscreen, contrasting with the health benefits associated with reading physical books. The inefficiencies and shortcomings of reading e-books as opposed to real books cannot be ignored.
While these facts may alter a reader’s opinion, they alone cannot dictate a reader’s taste in books.
Ultimately, the right choice comes down to preference. Each literary medium serves a different purpose.
If you choose to disregard the negative health effects and prefer to strain your eyes against the white glare of a screen as you process words and sentences with difficulty on a platform devoid of sentimental value, then sticking to e-books is the choice for you.
However, if you take pleasure in actually remembering what you read, and savoring the antiquity of stories that you can hold in your hands as you glide your fingertips, page by page, against the smooth paper of a musty book, completely immersed in tantalizing script, then choosing hard-copy books is the way to go.
Read more about Anne Mangen’s studies here.
Recommended articles:
NY Times – Reading Literature on Screen: A Price for Convenience?
.Mic – Science Has Great News For People Who Read Actual Books
—
Rawan AbuShaban is the principal writer at Bookselves. Follow her on Twitter @obirawankenobi.
Follow Bookselves:

A very well written and amazing article!
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is a great post. I love what you are doing guys.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting article, but I have to disagree with most of it. The millions of books aren’t at our fingertips, they are at libraries and people selling books, at bookstores. In reality while there exist millions of books accessing them is not very easy even for those who do know how to use common resources. While e-books are literally at our fingertips. Type a name of the book in Amazon or just google and voila. e-books are there in hundreds of thousands and their numbers are growing exponentially as texts are being re-published in mobi or epub formats.
Existence of websites like goodreads.com gives you possibility to “browse” for books, look at the shelves in genres, or recommendations or whatever you may need. The “pursuit of literature” hasn’t gone anywhere.
E-books give you information: I simply can’t agree to that. Reading from an e-reader such as Amazon Kindle or a nook gives you pretty much the same experience. The new e-ink displays are not harmful to the readers eyes in way or format. e-books can hinder the immersion into a book only for very sentimental people who like to read “real books”, be it the smell or the physical weight that they want, which in my opinion is silly, it is the text and the message that matter.
Again, e-readers don’t damage your health. There is absolutely no glare in e-ink display e-readers. Like literally, none. And they are much less heavy and portable so that you can read in any position that fits you, instead of turning every time you turn a page.
LikeLike
Dear Vahagn, even though you are presenting an interesting view point, there are some concepts that I don’t think are absolutely right. Personally I am a big fan of technology and I am an industry profession in that field, so don’t think that I am a technophobe 😀 Here, I would like to present how I think about real books.
First of all, you are not getting the same feelings when you are reading the actual book, compared to the reading an e-book. I am sure that there are thousands of people who will agree with this point, because reading a real book is way more enjoyable and satisfactory.
Second of all, computer screens are stress. Recently I have read an article that states that reading from the screen for a long time usually causes certain types of the stress. From my personal experience I have seen some people who got really annoyed because of the reading from the screen for a long time.
Third of all, according to this research (http://patriotupdate.com/articles/real-books-better-e-books/), “real books promote better comprehension, recognition, and recall”. There are a lot more reasons, but I will simply say that real books are just BETTER 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dear Dominic, Sorry for the late response, but I still disagree. I really think that “having a more satisfying feeling while reading a real book” is nothing more than some sort of placebo, self-persuasion that something should be different and therefore actually feel different. While computer screens are stress, Kindle/Nook e-ink display is not an LCD/LED display, it does not put any stress on reader’s eyes.
I don’t know.. I’m not a technophile either, however with my Kindle I have access to more books and also read more, I haven’t experienced any comprehension issues compared to when I read a real book. Actually, since I don’t read in my native language(Armenian), but read in English/German/Russian the build in dictionaries give better experience.
LikeLike
People should appreciate the value of “real books”. I hope your project will be successful.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I support your your opinion. Go Bookselves!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
How can I learn more about your company? I am really interested…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you guys for your feedback. We appreciate that.
Sam you can visit our official page – http://www.book-selves.com
LikeLike
I definitely agree with your ideas and I love reading real books. I think people should go back to the old good days when they had a chance to interact more with real books.
LikeLike